The real female body turns me on

I just read an article about "Why are we grossed out by female armpit hair?" Well, I'm not grossed out by it, I'm turned on - assuming of course that the female armpit in question belongs to a woman I find attractive. There's something so raw and powerful about an attractive woman who cares so little about what society expects of her. I feel the same way about female pubic hair.

In the "I contradict myself" vein, I do find hairy female legs a major turn-off, and I don't like guys with too much hair anywhere. Go figure.

My wife usually shaves her pits and trims her pubes, but in the winter, she often lets herself get pretty furry, knowing that I love it. When she's dominating me, I love for her to "make me" smell her hairy armpits, and a couple of times a week, I get the huge pleasure of burying my face in her hairy pussy for a long time.

I guess part of why it turns me on, and why it turns so many people off (especially Millennials), has to do with porn, and timing. When I hit puberty, most women in porn still had pubic hair. I remember the first time I saw a woman in porn (probably Seka) with a shaved pussy, I thought she might be a child and I was majorly turned off. And I was maybe 13 at the time! Around that same time, I ran across some vintage porn pics from circa 1920. The women (French?) had hairy pits and pubes and serious attitude. The pics got me off and just the thought of them is still arousing.

I still don't like the look of a shaved pussy, but I've gotten used to it enough that it's no longer a major turn off. Which is a good thing, because otherwise I wouldn't have enjoyed much of the porn that's come out in the last 25 years! I can totally understand why someone in their 20s or 30s today who has learned about women and their sexuality primarily from porn would find hairlessness attractive, and hairiness revolting. I think it's a shame, and yet another reason porn isn't good sex education! But I do understand that if you see hundreds of women, all "cleanly" shaven everywhere before you see a "natural" woman, you're going to find a natural (unshaven) female body a gross, confusing thing.

The men in porn when I was a teenager were mostly pretty hairy, often very hairy. I didn't find them attractive, except for the ones with nice cocks. The only guy I had seen naked at that point had hairy pubes and pits, and a little hair in his ass crack, but was pretty much smooth everywhere else (I was 16, almost 17, and he was almost 16). And yes, he had a nice cock! He turned me on so much that I must have fixated on him as the ideal man. That's my best guess, anyway. Fortunately, the mostly hair-free male look is common now, in pro porn, amateur porn and even in mainstream movies/TV - and real life. Even on the beach this weekend, I saw more 20- and 30-something guys without major chest hair or back hair than with it.

But some male body hair is sexier than none. I don't like to see guys with zero chest hair, or no leg/arm hair. I've even reached a point where facial hair is OK. Back hair, though? That can go!

As for women, there's been a small but noticeable pushback against hairlessness lately. Even in porn, some women are letting their bushes grow (even if they're still bare on the pussy lips and ass crack), and in the mainstream world, more women are growing (and occasionally flaunting) their armpit hair. I hope someday soon, female pubic hair will be considered normal again. I don't care if female armpit hair continues to gross most people out, though. Somehow, that just makes it more of a turn on for me!